The crit for the research booklet was primarily a presentation of the booklet formally to rest of the group as well as Amber and Simon, this was more of a presentation than a chance to receive feedback although some comments where made. Simon and Amber did say they liked the format I had chosen for the booklet and that it was relevant to the content of the booklet.
The next day the crit was continued and this offered a chance for more formal feedback to be given. This crit was ran as a class and we walked around and saw everybody's work leaving feedback on people's work where relevant.
Feedback Received:
- I'm a huge fan of the word play, personal response to the research evidenced nicely
- Interactive format is very successful and how you have approached your research
- Proof read your work -Vactioner?
- Really good foldable layout design
- Interesting attention drawing headings
- Humans of new york cool layout and use of photos
- Well thought out good breadth of research
- Cool format bro
- Very conceptual format
- Make research more personal it will then be cut down dramatically
Moving Forward
- A major problem with the research booklet at the moment is that it is extremely text heavy and that a lot of text needs to cut out and it was suggested that I can do this by making the content more personal, moving forward I will need to consider making the booklet a lot less text heavy
- I'm glad the format of the publication was so well received and everyone was in agreement that the format worked well
- Proof read my work before I print the final version!
- The humans of new york layout was well received for being good and interesting layout of information but this is not reflected in the rest of the booklet I will consider bringing more of this design to the rest of the booklet to main continuity but also to cut down the content and make the layout more interesting
Leave your comment