Low Quality Category
Medium Quality Category
High quality Category
High
- High quality Stock
- Sustainability
- Luxurious imagery
- Durability qualities
- Net Complexity
- Colour
- Print Processes such as foiling and embossing
- Functional products
- Durable
- Mundane
- Familiarity To Design (we become familiar to some design we see day in day out)
- Ephemera
- Disposability
- Bad designs
- Functional
- Looking Mass-Produced
- Poor Quality images
- Mimicry of higher quality products
- Overcrowded designs and typography
- Sometimes Gaurish Colours (In Context)
As decided by year
High Quality Print
- Nice feeling stock
- Sustainability
- Aesthetic that looks and appears expensive, although it my it not be, creating an illusion
- Durability
- Net complexity
Medium Quality
- Disposability
- Good durability but design doesn't match
- Familiarity
- The stock maybe mundane and the design is not appealing to the consumer nor aesthetically pleasing
- Imitative
Low Quality
- Over crowding of the design, use of bold colours that are often not complementary and use of a number for of fonts, often three or more
- Looks and appears mass produced
- Poor quality images, especially within food packaging
- Attempts mimicry of higher quality products
- The packaging is either not needed or excessive packaging has been used
Contextual to quality
- Colour
Leave your comment